![]() ![]() The experimenters created competition between the groups and, as predicted, the levels of hostility and aggressive behaviour between the groups increased. Then, the two groups were introduced to each other and immediately signs of conflict began. During this time, the boys bonded with the other boys in their group. For the first week, the two groups of boys were separated and did not know about each other. The experimenters took two groups of 11- and 12-year-old boys to what they thought was a summer camp. This experiment tested the Realistic Conflict Theory, and is an example of how negative attitudes and behaviours arise between groups due to competition over limited resources. Be the one to take action! (Source: Socially Psyched) Don't always assume that someone else will help, that someone is specified to take action on behalf of others. If the group acts as if everything is OK then it must be, right? Wrong. Don't let the passivity of others result in your inaction. We seem to rely heavily on the responses of others even against our own instincts. The experiment was a great example of people responding slower (or not at all) to emergency situations in the presence of passive others. 9 out of 10 subjects actually kept working on the questionnaire, while rubbing their eyes and waving smoke out of their faces. ![]() However when two actors were present, who were working with the experimenters and told to act as if nothing was wrong, only 10% of the subjects left the room or reported the smoke. The average time to report was 2 minutes of first noticing the smoke. When alone, 75% of people reported the smoke almost immediately. What do you do? You would get up and leave, tell someone in charge and do so without hesitation, right? Now imagine the same situation, except that you are not alone, you are with several other people who don't seem to care about the smoke. This experiment had people alone in a room filling out a questionnaire, when smoke starts coming from under the door. Three days earlier, Bell had played to a full house at Boston’s Symphony Hall, where seats went for over $100.(Source: Snopes) The experiment raised some interesting questions about how we not only value beauty, but extent that which the setting and presentation make a difference. When children would occasionally stop to listen, their parents would grab them and quickly usher them on their way. Washington Post writer Gene Weingarten set up the event “as an experiment in context, perception and priorities - as well as an unblinking assessment of public taste: In a banal setting at an inconvenient time, would beauty transcend?” No one noticed that one of the best musicians in the world had played one of the most intricate pieces ever written with a violin worth 3.5 million dollars. No one applauded, nor was there any recognition. When he finished playing and silence took over, no one noticed it. About 20 gave him money but continued to walk their normal pace. Only 6 people stopped and stayed to listen for a while. were, without publicity, treated to a free mini-concert performed by violin virtuoso Joshua Bell, who played for approximately 45 minutes, performing six classical pieces (two of which were by Bach), on his handcrafted 1713 Stradivarius violin (for which Bell reportedly paid $3.5 million). On 12th January 2007, about a thousand morning commuters passing through a subway station in Washington, D.C. Elliott giving favourable preference to brown-eyed students.Īs a result, whichever group was favoured by Elliott performed enthusiastically in class, answered questions quickly and accurately, and performed better in tests those who were discriminated against felt more downcast, were hesitant and uncertain in their answers, and performed poorly in tests. Elliott began a two-day "blue eyes/brown eyes" exercise to reinforce the unfairness of discrimination and racism: Students with blue eyes were given preferential treatment, given positive reinforcement, and made to feel superior over those with brown eyes for one day the procedure was reversed the next day, with Ms. Not feeling that the discussion was getting through to her class, who did not normally interact with minorities in their rural town, Ms. In 1968, following the murder of civil rights leader Martin Luther King, teacher Jane Elliott tried discussing issues of discrimination, racism, and prejudice with her third grade class in Riceville, Iowa.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |